Texas A&M-CC
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,529  Morgan McCutchen FR 22:05
1,597  Cynthia Quiroga SO 22:08
1,630  Liz Romo JR 22:10
2,296  carrisa pinon JR 22:54
2,415  Rebekah Hardee FR 23:02
2,892  Linda Garcia SO 23:57
3,007  Naila Flores FR 24:15
3,529  Brandie Garcia JR 27:36
National Rank #247 of 344
South Central Region Rank #18 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 16th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 95.4%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Morgan McCutchen Cynthia Quiroga Liz Romo carrisa pinon Rebekah Hardee Linda Garcia Naila Flores Brandie Garcia
Islander Splash 09/16 1278 22:15 21:37 22:18 22:30 23:44 23:34 27:23
Texas A&M Invitational 09/24 1283 22:13 21:44 21:56 23:06 23:55
Southland Conference Championships 10/28 1287 21:57 22:04 21:52 23:16 22:55 24:38 25:14 27:33
South Central Region Championships 11/11 1297 22:03 22:17 22:45 22:45 23:13





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 17.2 490 0.2 0.3 1.4 3.3 9.0 23.4 22.1 15.8 11.9 8.3 3.6 1.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Morgan McCutchen 78.2
Cynthia Quiroga 80.4
Liz Romo 82.5
carrisa pinon 118.8
Rebekah Hardee 125.5
Linda Garcia 162.8
Naila Flores 170.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 0.2% 0.2 11
12 0.3% 0.3 12
13 1.4% 1.4 13
14 3.3% 3.3 14
15 9.0% 9.0 15
16 23.4% 23.4 16
17 22.1% 22.1 17
18 15.8% 15.8 18
19 11.9% 11.9 19
20 8.3% 8.3 20
21 3.6% 3.6 21
22 1.1% 1.1 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0